Reports for counsel
Two fixed-price products built on coded databases of decided cases and models validated on decisions they never saw. Every number traces to a citable decision or a documented method.
For mediation, demand letters and setting client expectations. Not for filing; no testimony exposure.
For filing. Signed, disclosed, and built to withstand a Daubert challenge and cross-examination.
Rush (48 hours): +50%. Multi-plaintiff or multi-scenario memos quoted on request. Fees are in USD and never contingent on outcome.
Scope
| A good fit | Not a fit |
|---|---|
| Wrongful termination, retaliation and employment damages | Criminal matters |
| Discrimination, disparate impact and pay equity (Title VII, ADEA, Equal Pay Act, state analogues) | Matters adverse to Canadian federal or provincial governments |
| Class and collective actions: commonality, aggregate damages, sampling | Legal opinions or strategy; NorthLaw is not a law firm |
| Lost-income and economic-loss projections with proper uncertainty | Contingent or outcome-linked fees, in any form |
| Rebuttal of an opposing expert's statistics | Forensic accounting or business valuation |
Samples
Each sample is a complete memo on an illustrative matter: bottom line first, tables and charts, sensitivity, method, and the limits stated rather than buried. Facts and figures are invented; the structure is exactly what you receive.
Age-based selection analysis: standard-deviation tests, the four-fifths screen, logistic regression with the employer's rebuttal factors, and where the argument turns.
Read the sampleGender pay gap across six specifications, quantile regression, Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition, tainted-variable analysis of job level, and exposure under each side's framing.
Read the sampleOff-the-clock wage claim: stratified sampling plan, commonality diagnostics across 46 stores, aggregate damages with a confidence interval, and the de minimis sensitivity.
Read the sampleBack pay from documents, front pay under three duration scenarios, work-life and attrition adjustment, and the one fact that decides which scenario applies.
Read the sampleDefense-side review of a promotion-disparity report: eligibility pool, aggregation, clustering and coding, with what survives correction and what does not.
Read the sampleAppeal-or-settle: reversal rates in comparable Ninth Circuit Title VII appeals, a validated model estimate with an interval, timing, and the one argument that moves the odds most.
Read the sampleGet started
Two paragraphs are enough. You will receive a fixed quote and conflict check within one business day. Nothing you send is shared; NorthLaw will sign your firm's NDA on request.